Political Censorship - Jaeger File #1

 

 I am not going to agree or disagree with Mr. Jaeger's opinions posted on Nextdoor. But in an effort to beat the one-sided, election-time bias of the Nextdoor censors, here is what he posted, and for unexplained reasons was deleted without his consent.

   The moderator's choice of what they do and do not remove raises questions about who is playing politics with this.



Comments

  1. bigeasywiscoApril 3, 2023 at 5:43 AM

    Ken, I would not even acknowledge an association with that psyhco. I get he's probably your friend, but since you've been backing him up, I may be switching my vote to Voll now.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Unedited Answers to a Reporter's Most Recent Questions

   Kronenwetter Residents and Voters,    In an attempt to help voters be as fully informed as possible, I have provided the complete text of my answers to reporter Brian Kowalski's questions that he used as a basis for his latest City Pages Article.    Overall, I won't complain too much about how Mr, Kowalski presented things, but since he ignored so much information, I am h oping that this post will be much more informative to you about my work as trustee, than the news article was.     I think that what could have been a much longer, more informative article, was cut short due to insufficient answers by incumbent Voll (candidate Straub apparently got cold feet at the last minute and did not provide any answers).    Also, while we realize that everything cannot be included in every article, compare the answers below to the article, and note how selective reporters and editors can be in what they choose to publish and not p...
Read more

Nextdoor Chronicles #1 The Forum and bigger issues

Image
  ken charneski Kronenwetter • 17 hr ago   A candidates view of the forum.  In general, I think many questions were mundane enough, however there were a couple of clearly tendentious questions from the audience that provided a soapbox for one candidate's negative campaigning about some vague, personal beef she suddenly has with Village Board “leadership”, and employee turnover.     The questions came from the audience in written form, and the forum committee decided which ones would be presented. I was disappointed to find out afterward that some very pertinent and even-handed questions from the audience were ignored while they took new questions more amenable to more liberal ideologies.     The format of the forum was such, that 90 seconds gave plenty of time for someone to make false claims and accusations without substantiating them, while that same time frame made it nearly impossible to decisively rebut such claims with the factual d...
Read more

Nextdoor Chronicles #3 Skepticism and Discernment

Image
This is a series that includes Nextdoor exchanges that I thought people might be interested in. Skepticism and Discernment   Judi Akey Kronenwetter • 5 days ago Thanks so much to the Village Board (Trustee) Candidates and the County Board Candidates who participated in the Kronenwetter Candidates’ Forum this evening. The audience asked them some good questions and we heard some good responses. I especially want to thank the organizing committee made up of Geri Kowalski, Pat Kilsdonk, Judy Fries, and Judy Hatz. Would work with any one or all of them again any day! And, a special thanks to all the people who attended (some even helped us take down tables, chairs, etc. at evening's end! - that's the kind of people we have in Kronenwetter!) Residents, please continue to learn all you can about the candidates, carefully analyze what you hear, throw in just a bit of healthy skepticism when someone has ALL the answers, and make sure you vote on April 5th. ken charneski • Kronen...
Read more