2026 Bad News Budget Bloaters (removed)

I have removed this article as a gesture of goodwill to those involved.

 I have assurances from the Administrator that in the future  the budget process will start earlier in the year and be more transparent, and allow  public and committee review and input.

Thanks

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Political Censorship - Jaeger File #1

Image
   I am not going to agree or disagree with Mr. Jaeger's opinions posted on Nextdoor. But in an effort to beat the one-sided, election-time bias of the Nextdoor censors, here is what he posted, and for unexplained reasons was deleted without his consent.    The moderator's choice of what they do and do not remove raises questions about who is playing politics with this.
Read more

Ethics in Kronenwetter –the Real Issues

  Ethics in Kronenwetter –the Real Issues by Ken Charneski There are two types of behavior currently being discussed at the APC committee which I chair, both under the heading of “ethics”. There are statutory ethics (improper personal gain or advantage) as one type. Then, there is the more subjective personal behavior kind of ethics which is not ethics at all, but simply an individual's behavior that someone else wishes to determined as unacceptable. The t rue statutory ethics violations can always be reported to the police for prosecution, which to my knowledge has never been done, or had reason to be done in this Village. There is a basis for enacting that kind of Ethics Code, though past experience shows that it is easier said than done. The Problem The problem with a proposed enforceable personal conduct kind of ethics, is the question of the ethics and integrity of those who would presume to enforce it . There is a small group (about 8 c...
Read more

my public input addressing corruption in Kronenwetter government

 Below is my public input that I used as a means to address an issue. I mention several documents that were quietly handed out by Mr. Downey at the meeting.   Public Input for the 3/22/22 Village Board meeting.     This is about the March 7 meeting and the effort to remove a committee member.     I find it interesting that there was no packet report on this item – no explanation, no definition of charges, no victims – nothing. There was not even any complaints or so-called evidence posted in the packet. I'd like to see those 4 documents that were handed to the Board, presumably as evidence, to be retro-actively added to that information packet so the public can see what it is that Mr. Lesniak, Voll, and Downey based this action on.      One was an anonymous complaint. I completely refuted the second complaint from December of 2020 as being obviously hysterical, and of having no credibility whatsoever. This debunking i...
Read more